Nov
15
2011
0

Even starbucks can’t do real-time personalization

Often I use Starbucks as one of the best examples of a company doing customer loyalty marketing right – as they typically use their marketing database very well, sending out emails and direct mail postcards personalized to myself as an individual. Yet today a chink in the armor surfaced, and it actually points to a deficiency that I think is very common across companies & marketing departments. While it’s very easy today to make an email “personalized” in terms using a person’s name across the content, it’s much harder to take other interactions that a prospect / customer has and overlay it across all your touchpoints to ensure all your messages are relevant.

Case in point – I was sent an email about Starbucks’ new iphone app. (Apparently the old one will break, and you gotta get the new one.) The problem is that I don’t currently use an iphone app. However, I just downloaded a Starbucks Android app a few weeks ago. If Starbucks were truly at the cutting edge of customer relevancy they would have taken the data that I gave them when I downloaded my app and matched the email that I used within the app, which is the same email address as is linked with my rewards account and email opt-in subscription. All of that data should have fed to a database that updated my profile in terms of what channels I’m using to relate to the brand. Android, yes. iPhone, no. It’s a pretty simple distinction, but it’s a data complexity that’s hard for Starbucks, and I think all major consumer brands to get a hold of.

Part of the problem is that usually companies use a stand alone service to send out their marketing emails. That service, while excellent at delivering emails and producing reporting for those emails, fails when it has to integrate data from other systems. It’s not just email, because companies have to deal with data collected from social media efforts, customer website visits, loyalty program interactions, direct mail responses, phone calls and other touches. This is why it’s critical that every company invests in their systems so they communicate with each other. There isn’t yet a holy grail company that will handle this perfectly across channels, but there are quite a few that are coming close and make it a priority to easily integrate with other systems whether it be custom apps for that platform, or more generally, an API that can be used to sync relevant fields.

In the end, it’s really the customer’s experience that matters. When a loyal Starbucks customer like myself gets disappointed by a “miss” experience like this, and I get an advertisement from Pete’s Coffee or a local coffeeshop that impresses me, then I’m one step closer to being an ex-customer. But for now, I’ll forgive Starbucks, because I know how frustrating data silos can be.

May
22
2009
0

Gizmo5 Business Class VOIP – will they grab Skype’s business customers?

I just received an email about a new service aimed toward small businesses.  Basically the offer is for a PBX based phone system with unlimited calling.  A great offer that I have not seen anywhere else, and seems like it really zeros in on the missing niche audiences that Skype is not going after.
 
 
VirtualPBX handles the call routing (internal to the company) for a monthly fee using standard PBX technology, and Gizmo5 handles the transmission of the phone call over normal telephone networks.  Their focus on business customers is very smart as I don’t believe Skype has a similar offering. Skype’s business offering has just been the consumer offering with one or two more features.  Gizmo5′s package really focuses on the need for businesses to have a robust internal phone system and their desire to minimize costs.  Great idea. Hope to see more of this in the future.

Posted via email from OverLinked

May
14
2009
0

Why Focus Groups Fail Customers and Companies

Let’s say a company is in the business of making plastic drinking cups for children. While on the surface this may sound like a trivial matter, it is not, as anyone with children knows. The right drinking cup can play a leading role in getting a child to sleep and making mealtime a relatively peaceful endeavor. Traditional customer focus groups bring a group of customers together and place two cups on the table. They ask the customers, “Which cup do you prefer?” The customer will then pick a cup. But that doesn’t mean either cup is the best cup for them. Maybe the customer needs a cup with a straw. But the company didn’t take the time to think about the customers’ life. In the absence of getting what was right, the customer picked what was available.

This is a great article about the use of focus groups to try to determine consumer preference. Sometimes, the way you ask someone a question determines their answer. It’s very hard (but essential) to step outside of the box and rethink the approach. It’s almost like you have to disregard your own product entirely, and focus on the customers “lifestyle” or “business environment” and once you have a firm grasp on that – you can overlay a product/service and find the ways it fits, and more importantly , the ways it does not fit.

This will give direction toward product enhancements and improvements that will be true steps forward in innovation.

Posted via web from OverLinked

Apr
01
2009
0

Report: Marketers web-strategy not listening to SMB needs

The SMB world
What SMBs rely on offline…
– 43,6% newspaper and magazine articles
– 43,5% direct mail (including letters, postcards and catalogs)
– 32% radio/TV ads
– 27,4% phone calls
What SMBs rely on online…
– 72% online referrals (friends and peers) most popular information source on products and services
– 57% search engine marketing
– 44,5% educational websites
What SMBs favorite in social media…
– 19.7% Facebook
– 15,6% LinkedIn
– 11,3% Twitter

Interesting research that suggests B2B companies who are focused on Small and Medium Businesses, should carefully consider the media mix they are using to communicate. SMB’s still prefer communication through traditional offline channels.

Posted via web from OverLinked

Written by in: Business | Tags: , , ,
Mar
16
2009
0

“Targeted” is not a theme, it’s a necessity

 
The winterberry group is now seeing a trend that we have seen for a while. That marketers are requiring more specialized, focused campaigns that take advantage of a more personal approach to niche groups.  Some companies have already built tools to focus marketing on targeted messaging, others will have to catch up.
 

The white paper outlines six trends that took hold in 2008 and another three that are expected to continue defining the role of direct mail in 2009. Expected 2009 trends include:

  • Recession forces decrease in spending
  • Volumes fall as mailers seek efficiencies
  • Production sector in crisis
  • New demand for data, analytics, multichannel
  • Mail emerges as ideal complement to digital
  • “Green” practices fluctuate in importance
  • End of untargeted, high-volume campaigns
  • New marketing automation technologies applied
  • Postal Service as the principal mail delivery channel compromised

Posted via email from OverLinked

Powered by WordPress | Theme: Aeros 2.0 by TheBuckmaker.com